CO129-459 - Individuals - 1919 — Page 78

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

T. and ^ C 76 except for certain correspondence which was put in the

Appellant relied for his case solely upon the facts admitted

in the Pleadings. Viva voce evidence was adduced on

behalf of the Respondents and certain further correspondence

was put in.

14. As a result the following facts were admitted or proved,

15. The Appellant was a natural born British subject, born

in Penang in the year 1853 and had been employed as a

Government Interpreter in the Police and Supreme Courts for many years. He subsequently entered the service of

Solicitors practising in the Colony, and at the time of his

arrest was employed by Mr d'Almada Castro.

16. The Warrant was, as previously set out, issued on the

2nd November, and on the 5th November the Appellant was

arrested under such warrant and taken to the Victoria Gaol

which was the House of Detention under the Ordinance, no other

building having been appointed by the Governor under Section 11.

17. After the arrest and detention of the Appellant,

Edit History

2026-06-14 06:02:31 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
T. and ^ C 76 except for certain correspondence which was put in theAppellant relied for his case solely upon the facts admittedin the Pleadings. Viva voce evidence was adduced onbehalf of the Respondents and certain further correspondencewas put in.14. As a result the following facts were admitted or proved,15. The Appellant was a natural born British subject, bornin Penang in the year 1853 and had been employed as aGovernment Interpreter in the Police and Supreme Courts for many years. He subsequently entered the service ofSolicitors practising in the Colony, and at the time of hisarrest was employed by Mr d'Almada Castro.16. The Warrant was, as previously set out, issued on the2nd November, and on the 5th November the Appellant wasarrested under such warrant and taken to the Victoria Gaolwhich was the House of Detention under the Ordinance, no otherbuilding having been appointed by the Governor under Section 11.17. After the arrest and detention of the Appellant,
Baseline (Original)
:T. and ^ C 76 except for certain correspondence which was put in theAppellant relied for his oase solely upon the facts admittedin the Fleadings. Viva vode evidence was adduced onbehalf of the Respondents and certain further correspondencewas put in.14. As a result the following facts were admitted or proved,15. The Appellant was a natural born British subject, hornin Penang in the year 1853 and had been employed as aGovernment Interpreter in the Police and Supreme Courts fora many years, He subsequently entered the service ofSolicitors practising in the Colony, and at the time of hisarrest was employed by Mr d'Almada Castro.16. The Farrant was, as previously set out, lesued on the2nd November, and on the 5th November the Appellant wasarrested under such warrant and taken to the victoria GaolNGURA 20izemok swhich was theHouse of Detention under the Ordinance, no otherna gamma (6)IEbuilding having been appointed by the Governor under Section 11.17. After the arrest and detention of the Appellan), the
2026-06-14 06:02:31 · Baseline
View content

:

T.

and

^

C

76

except for certain correspondence which was put in the

Appellant relied for his oase solely upon the facts admitted

in the Fleadings.

Viva vode evidence was adduced on

behalf of the Respondents and certain further correspondence

was put in.

14.

As a result the following facts were admitted or proved,

15.

The Appellant was a natural born British subject, horn

in Penang in the year 1853 and had been employed as a

Government Interpreter in the Police and Supreme Courts for a

many years,

He subsequently entered the service of

Solicitors practising in the Colony, and at the time of his

arrest was employed by Mr d'Almada Castro.

16.

The Farrant was, as previously set out, lesued on the

2nd November, and on the 5th November the Appellant was

arrested under such warrant and taken to the victoria Gaol

NGURA 20

izemok s

which was theHouse of Detention under the Ordinance, no other

na gamma (6)

IE

building having been appointed by the Governor under Section

11.

17.

After the arrest and detention of the Appellan), the

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.